Microbial contamination during space flight presents a variety of health hazards to the crew and deterioration of essential materials. The level of airborne microbial contaminants has been established as an important factor in the dissemination of infectious diseases. The Shuttle/Spacelab serves as a small closed environmental system with a limited ability for the removal of airborne microbes. Microbe-laden droplets and particulates generated by coughs, sneezes, and crew activities are removed from the air in minutes at one g; however, these droplets can remain suspended for hours in microgravity.
The Johnson Space Center (JSC) Microbiology Laboratory Implemented a Microbial Contamination Control Plan at the onset of the Shuttle missions. One facet of the plan was to quantify and identify airborne microbial contaminants. The cabin air was evaluated preflight and postflight to assess the efficacy of the environmental control system in removing such contaminants. The presence of an open hatch and the activities of various ground support personnel during sample collection jeopardizes the scientific validity of such studies. In-flight monitoring was the only scientifically sound method for assessing the levels and types of airborne microbial contaminants during a mission. The impact of the length of mission, number of crewmembers, and the inclusion of animals and other biological specimens upon the microbial load of the Orbiter's air can be assessed only by the evaluation of in-flight air. The collection of inflight samples was necessary to obtain baseline data prior to those flights involving animals.
APPROACH:
Evaluation of the airborne microorganisms was achieved by the using a microbial monitor. Two minute air samples were taken with the RCS using trypticase soy agar strips or rose Bengal agar strips. Samples were taken during the preflight, in-flight, and postflight phases of the missions. The sample sites were located on both the middeck and the flight deck. The microorganisms collected on all air strips were quantitated and identified.
RESULTS:
Postflight microbial levels were generally 20-80% higher than preflight levels. However, the in-flight measurements were more useful in evaluating the microbial levels of crew exposure during the mission. Four slight drops in the microbial load were experienced during the first part of the mission, but this was followed by a rapid increase as the mission proceeded. The last in-flight levels increased as much as 200-400 percent over the first in-flight levels.
In-flight monitoring of the air proved to be a useful means of identifying microbial changes that occurred during missions. A slight drop in the level of microorganisms in the air was common during the early stages of the missions. This would indicate that the filtration system was adequate to clean the air at that time. However, as the mission progressed, the filtration system was no longer able to clear the air; the levels of contamination increased as the mission proceeded. This may have been due to the clogging of the filters with debris. It is logical to assume that longer missions and larger crews would increase the levels of contamination even more.
A number of potentially pathogenic fungi were isolated. The fungi have become increasingly important with the advent of the reusable spacecraft. Although the fungi are relatively slow growers, they are also very resistant to adverse conditions and remain viable for long periods of time. They remain dormant under adverse conditions but resume growth when conditions become more favorable. They pose a threat to the health of the crewmembers as 1) agents of infection, 2) allergens, and 3) producers of toxic metabolites. In addition, they are able to synthesize a vast array of enzymes enabling them to deteriorate practically every organic compound known.